" />

Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Email:[email protected] & [email protected]
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2020 Vol.39 No.4

Utilization Characteristics of Resources and Niche Differentiation of Grus leucogeranus and Anser fabalis During Migration Period in the Momoge National Nature Reserve, Jilin
Author of the article:LI Luanxin, PAN Hongru, TIAN Ye, LEI Zefeng, ZOU Hongfei*
Author's Workplace:College of Wildlife Resources and Protected Area, Northeast Forest University, Harbin 150040, China
Key Words:Momoge National Nature Reserve; Grus leucogeranus; Anser fabalis; resource utilization; niche
Abstract:In order to understand the resource utilization characteristics and niche differentiation of Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus) population and bean goose (Anser fabalis) population, G. leucogeranus and A. fabalis were studied during their migration periods in the Momoge National Nature Reserve (Jilin Province) in autumn (2018) and spring (2019). The habitat utilizations of G. leucogeranus and A. fabalis in the reserve were investigated by using the method of fixed route survey and fixed point observation. The resource utilization and niche differentiation were studied by calculating the habitat utilization rate, niche width, and niche overlap. The results showed that the main habitat used by G. leucogeranus during migration period was reed marsh, while those used by A. fabalis were reed marsh and sedge marsh. In term of the habitat environment, the utilization rate of sedge marsh and open water environment was relatively higher in A. fabalis population, while G. leucogeranus preferred meadow, reed marsh and farmland; the niche overlap value peaked in the autumn migration period, reaching 0.654. In term of the offshore distance, G. leucogeranus mainly chose the environments of 0-50 m and 50-100 m offshore, while A. fabalis chose the environments of 150-200 m offshore or larger than 200 m; the niche overlap value peaked in the autumn migration period, reaching 0.612. In term of the foraging space, G. leucogeranus preferred reed bank, farmland and mud land, while A. fabalis preferred sedge bank; the niche overlap value peaked in the spring migration period, reaching 0.595. In conclusion, the utilization characteristics of resources and dynamic change of the niche of G. leucogeranus and A. fabalis obviously reflected the response of birds to habitat change during migration period. The two waterfowl can coexist by selecting different environments to adjust the niche width, reduce the niche overlap and alleviate the resource allocation.
2020,39(4): 417-423 收稿日期:2019-12-02
作者簡介:李孿鑫(1995-),男,碩士研究生,從事生物資源監測與保護研究,E-mail:[email protected]
*通信作者:鄒紅菲,E-mail:[email protected]
崔楨, 章光新, 張蕾, 等. 2018. 基于白鶴生境需求的濕地生態水文調控研究——以莫莫格國家級自然保護區白鶴湖為例[J]. 濕地科學, 16(4):509-516.
范巍巍. 2012. 莫莫格國家級自然保護區白鶴遷徙期棲息地覓食生境選擇研究[D]. 哈爾濱:東北林業大學.
郭宏, 邵明勤, 胡斌華, 等. 2016. 鄱陽湖南磯濕地國家級自然保護區2種大雁的越冬行為特征及生態位分化[J]. 生態與農村環境學報, 32(1):90-95.
李, 朱金兆, 朱清科, 等. 2003. 生態位理論及其測度研究進展[J]. 北京林業大學學報, (1):100-107.
李全亮. 2017. 松嫩平原丹頂鶴與白枕鶴生境利用對比研究[D]. 哈爾濱:東北林業大學.
劉靜. 2011. 安徽升金湖國家級自然保護區豆雁的越冬食性和行為研究[D]. 合肥:中國科學技術大學.
馬英, 魏有文, 羅軍, 等. 2011. 青海省海東地區小型獸空間生態位分析[J]. 動物學雜志, 46(4):126-130.
楊成玉. 2008. 莫莫格國家級自然保護區濕地生態系統服務功能價值評估[D]. 長春:東北師范大學.
楊小農, 朱磊, 郝光, 等. 2012. 瓦屋山2種山雀的生態位分化和共存[J]. 動物學雜志, 47(4):11-18.
張晶, 趙成章, 任悅, 等. 2018. 張掖國家濕地公園優勢鳥類種群生態位研究[J]. 生態學報, 38(6):2213-2220.
趙鳳婷. 2013. 越冬白頭鶴種群與三種雁的覓食生境利用與資源分割研究[D]. 合肥:安徽大學.
趙正階. 2001. 中國鳥類志 上卷 非雀形目[M]. 吉林:吉林科學技術出版社.
左悅. 2008. 莫莫格國家級自然保護區昆蟲多樣性初步研究[D]. 長春:東北師范大學.
Beerns JM, Gawlik DE, Herring G, et al. 2011. Dynamic habitat selection by two wading bird species with divergent foraging strategies in a seasonally fluctuating wetland[J]. The Auk, 128(4):651-622.
Colwell RK, Futuyma DJ. 1971. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap[J]. Ecology, 52(4):567-576.
Gawlik DE. 2002. The effects of prey availability on the numerical response[J]. Ecological Monographs, 72(3):329-346.
González-Solís J, Croxall JP, Afanasyev V. 2007. Offshore spatial segregation in giant petrels Macronectes spp.:differences between species, sexes and seasons[J]. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 17(S1):22-36.
Kober K, Bairlein F. 2009. Habitat choice and niche characteristics under poor food conditions. A study on migratory nearctic shorebirds in the intertidal flats of Brazil[J]. Ardea, 97(1):31-42.
Kushlan JA. 1981. Resource use strategies of wading birds[J]. Wilson Bull, 93(2):145-163.
Levins R. 1970. Ordering the phenomena of ecology[J]. Science, 167(3924):1478-1480.
Nebel S, Jackson DL, Elner RW. 2005. Functional association of bill morphology and foraging behaviour in calidrid sandpipers[J]. Animal Biology, 55(3):235-243.
Oksanen L. 1987. Interspecific competition and the structure of bird guilds in Boreal Europe:the importance of doing fieldwork in right season[J]. Trends Ecology & Evolution, 2(12):376-379.
Pianka ER. 1981. Competition and niche theory[M]//Maverick A. Theoretical ecology(second edition). Durham:Blackwell.
Safran RJ, Colwell MA, Isola CR, et al. 2000. Foraging site selection by non-breeding white-faced Ibos[J]. The Condor, 102:211-215.
Schoener TW. 1974. Some methods for calculating competition coefficients from resource-utilization spectra[J]. The American Naturalist, 108(961):332-340.
Wermer EE, Hall DJ. 1979. Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competition sunfishes[J]. Ecology, 60(2):256-264.
Zhao MJ, Cao L, Fox AD. 2010. Distribution and diet of wintering tundra bean geese Anser fabalis serrirostris at Shengjin Lake, Yangtze River Floodplain, China[J]. Wildfowl, 60:52-63.
Zhou Q, Wei H, Tang H, et al. 2014. Niche separation of sympatric macaques, Macaca assamensis and M. mulatta, in limestone habitats of Nonggang, China[J]. Primates, 55(1):125-137.
CopyRight©2020 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology